In many countries hardly a news media outlet or government official will dare question the nature of the COVID-19 vaccines. One who has, however, is health proponent and researcher Dr. Joseph Mercola. In recent interviews with highly qualified scientists he gets the other side of the story, the one being completely omitted from everyday mainstream discourse.
In this post the short clips below are of Dr. Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientist with fifty years of experience at the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology and virologist Dr. Judy Mikovits, author of Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science. Their level of understanding of the potential changes in immune functioning and health from these vaccines are the questions the general scientific community and public should be asking of their health experts and policy and decision makers. But no one is asking anything.
According to Mercola, Dr. Seneff spent six months reading the vaccine developers’ literature and doing supplemental research before writing her own paper on the subject, which he called outstanding. Seneff says the companies have taken great steps to rig the mRNA vaccine so they could achieve the desired antibody production and “protection” from the virus. That goal she says is “reckless” because it has been done without any due consideration of other complications.
Engineered mRNA
Seneff begins the interview by describing the vaccine component biochemistry. The first thing noted is that the vaccine mRNA is not the same as the natural virus mRNA, which is readily metabolized by the body. Seneff states to make the mRNA more stable the vaccine makers added methyl-pseudouridines to it, which the body does not know how to break down. Not being able to break down the mRNA means there may be more long-term production or accumulation of spike proteins, for better or worse. A 16-minute segment of the first interview with Dr. Seneff is provided below.
According to Seneff, the developers were talking about the stability of the mRNA in the body lasting up to six months. This is about the same amount of time populations look to be required to have regular booster shots.
Spike Protein Changes
Another concern highlighted is that every A and T nucleotide in the mRNA strand has been changed to G and C. This she says was done so that “a lot more” of the spike protein could be made, again favoring antibody stimulation. However, because the body is very complex this stimulation may not always be needed leading to unintended consequences.
Elaborating, Seneff says that through vaccination and antibody stimulation the body comes to believe its powerful innate immune system has failed. This then sets up harmful altered responses and communication patterns between the various levels of immune cells. Essentially the messenger RNA vaccines trick the body out of its own intelligence, a familiar strategy the power elite uses on humans. People then end up relying more on their “second tier” adaptive system and the complications that drives. She further argues the health problems people are having are due to the overreactions of their immune systems which are too weak, rather than anything SARS-CoV-2 related.
Undesirable ACE-2 Binding
Due to the mRNA chemical reengineering, the produced spike proteins contain two proline amino acid components. This Seneff says makes the proteins more inflexible than those of the natural virus. While that allows more antibodies to gather around it, the spike proteins also then stick more to the cellular ACE-2 receptors, suppressing their function. She describes that this type of receptor blocking in the heart is how pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, and strokes get created, and how this would be some of the unseen, unlinked side effects of the vaccine months or years down the road.
Prion Diseases
Among many other details, Seneff describes that the spike protein is also a prion type of protein that can end up favoring Parkinson’s disease. She expects that as a result of the mRNA vaccines, crippling prion or neurodegenerative diseases will be seen in 10 – 15 years as will blood problems such as clots, hemorrhaging, and brain problems. These are more long-term effects. They would not be seen upon the injections but could initiate or result from the immune system getting triggered on future sickness or infection events.
In the second interview Dr. Mikovits gives her current assessment of the vaccine picture:
With regards to ACE-2 receptor disabling, Mikovits adds that when it happens in the lungs there is pulmonary hypertension and when the brain cells are affected, it is stroke.
Both scientists go into depth on the dysregulation of the innate and adaptive immune systems and how that activates any of the body’s latent viruses. Mikovits describes that this activation leads to DNA-methylation and then cancers, atherosclerosis, nervous disorders, and cardiovascular diseases. Mikovits is brutally honest. “The first people who are going to die are people with inflammatory conditions and cancer.”
In the segment below, Seneff and Mikovits give a prognosis of the direction they think this will play out. The consensus seems to be that the vaccinations will be the acceleration of sickness, disease, aging, and disabilities in younger and younger people.
Age of Transition 